- Back to the Main Site
- Daily Links
- Hat and Hair
- Topics A-C
- Topics D-G
- Topics H-M
- Topics N-S
- National Security
- Not So Easy Pieces
- Nuclear
- Obamacare
- Omaha Beach Diorama
- Opinion
- Outdoors
- Politics
- Poll
- Prepper
- Privacy
- Products You Need
- Racism
- Rant
- Recipes
- Regulation
- Religion
- Reloading Series
- Reviews
- Right to Repair
- Rule of Law
- Satire
- Science
- Second Amendment
- Secret Nazi President
- Sexuality
- Social Justice
- Social Media
- Society
- Sports
- Strength Training
- Subsidies
- SugarFree
- Supreme Court
- Topics T-Z
Select Page
Why are Becky’s check, Cortezs’ neck, Becky’s chin, Cortez’s microphone, Obama’s upper lip, Obama’s check, Obama’s lip again, Hill’s nostril, Becky’s chin again, Cortez’s lower lip, Don’s side chin, and Don’s lower upper right lip, talking? also needs more gratuitous violence. other than that good job. *thumbs up emoji*
Is Hill talking out her nostril or is she snorting up some fake news?
In the universe where I prefer photo realism over a surreal pastiche.
‘Surreal pastiche’ was my nickname in college.
Needs more labels.
also needs more gratuitous violence.
[slaps The Hyperbole]
*slap*
My favourite part about Becky’s right ear is that it’s like some kind of weird scarred hanging chad of cartilage.
Oh, I just posted this in the other thread.
I just put on Fox to watch the GG show. And it isn’t on. Sad.
Anyway, according to them Trump got the information from a Breitbart article based on “unnamed sources”. Then sent those tweets on Saturday morning. There was no mention whether the President was taking a shit at the same time.
So what seems weird to me. Well, except Trump’s impulsiveness. Is that even at this time, no one from the White House can say anything for sure. Don’t they have the authority to get FISA court records, even over the weekend?
This is weird, the Guardian published this on 11 January 2017:
“The Guardian has learned that the FBI applied for a warrant from the foreign intelligence surveillance (Fisa) court over the summer in order to monitor four members of the Trump team suspected of irregular contacts with Russian officials. The Fisa court turned down the application asking FBI counter-intelligence investigators to narrow its focus. According to one report, the FBI was finally granted a warrant in October, but that has not been confirmed, and it is not clear whether any warrant led to a full investigation. ”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/10/fbi-chief-given-dossier-by-john-mccain-alleging-secret-trump-russia-contacts
So why didn’t Trump find out about this earlier?
Maybe Trump was waiting for the right time. Despite the claim that he is merely impulsive, there’s plenty of evidence that he thinks ahead, sometimes several steps ahead of his opponents.
4D CHESS!!!!!
And it’s McCain doing TEAM BLUE’s work.
This was back on 7 November:
“Two separate sources with links to the counter-intelligence community have confirmed to Heat Street that the FBI sought, and was granted, a FISA court warrant in October, giving counter-intelligence permission to examine the activities of ‘U.S. persons’ in Donald Trump’s campaign with ties to Russia.”
https://heatst.com/world/exclusive-fbi-granted-fisa-warrant-covering-trump-camps-ties-to-russia/
I am not sure why people seem to be shocked or in disbelief about Obumbles engaging in tin-pot dictator tactics. The surprise to me would be if he didn’t. Why is this just coming out now?
I would just assume that Feds would be listening whenever anyone in the U.S. was speaking with anyone working for the Russian government. So I classify this under, “duh”:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/02/15/exclusive-nsa-whistleblower-agency-absolutely-tapping-trumps-calls/
So the only real issue is if they were specifically targeting the Trump campaign and passing that information around, as opposed to grabbing it in their regular overreaching mass surveillance and keeping it to themselves.
It’s not so much just coming out now as it is being made a big deal of now because Trump latched onto it in his predawn Twitter counterattack. The details of at least warrants were reported on much earlier.
The media creates the narrative, and while someone around these parts suggested there is no establishment and competition breeds a diversity of viewpoints, much of the alternative media is in fact just in response to the bullshit the usual suspects are spouting. The NYT’s, Washington Post, CNN, and network news.
And it’s not about anyone being genuinely surprised. There’s nothing honest about any of this. It’s just typical water-carrying for Democrats.
Obama is trouble.
there is a long tradition that presidents, in the wake of their own presidency, back the hell out of domestic politics and leave their replacement mostly alone.
some, like carter or clinton, go into ‘international philanthropy’ or the World Bank type stuff, which doesn’t really count. the point is that they leave domestic politics to their party. they might agitate on behalf of the party, but what they don’t do is continue to pretend that they still get to wield the “president” mantle in the press.
It was one thing for Obama to issue the occasional statement of “feels” on behalf of protestors and whatnot. It was to be expected.
but this whole recent “IM BACK” shit, 3 months into Trump’s presidency? Is beyond ‘unusual’. Its basically trying to cling to the prestige of the office.
I think its basically a continuation of the attempt to discredit the current admin. and i would not be surprised if Trump retaliates by dumping LOADS of dirt from his administration out into the public. As i said elsewhere, once the gloves come off (e.g. what the ‘deep state’ was doing, leaking stuff to destroy current nominees, etc.), suddenly everything becomes fair play.
“Obama is trouble” indeed.
Its a terrible trend. When political leaders start dropping all the self-imposed limits on how they use govt powers against political opponents…. it basically erodes institutions like cancer.
“there is a long tradition that presidents, in the wake of their own presidency, back the hell out of domestic politics and leave their replacement mostly alone.”
There’s Teddy Roosevelt and Taft, there’s…well, there’s Teddy Roosevent and Taft.
You forgot Grover Cleveland.
There we go.
And of course JQ Adams came back to the House (as an anti-Mason, though that particular detail seems to have been left out of that otherwise-fine movie Amistad).
And Andy Johnson went back to the Senate while his successor was still in office, though Johnson didn’t last very long, dying after a few months.
John Tyler was elected to the Senate too, wasn’t he?
I don’t think so, but he went to a North/South Peace Conference in 1861. Spoiler alert…it didn’t work.
I think he was in the Senate *before* being Pres.
There’s forests, and there’s trees.
The one thing that bugs me is that when these links came out, Trump could easily have made reference to J. Edgar Hoover keeping files on his political enemies, since that’s something that historically, everybody accepted is a bad thing. But instead he talked about Nazis? Communists?
I’m not a regular reader of Trump tweets, so i don’t know what you’re referring to…
..but my impression is that Trump is being very smart with the way he’s pushing back on Obama admin Gestapo-tactics, by using the exact same language his attackers use against him.
Its like a running theme he’s had = to enact many of the same policies and actions of the Obama admin, and when criticized, point back to the former and say, “But he did it too”; forcing the press to note that Obama deported millions, that he halted the refugee program, that he dumped lots of military gear on cops, and on and on and on.
If Trump starts comparing Obama admin actions to other totalitarian regimes…
….the effect it has is to force the press to go, “BUT THAT’S RIDICULOUS”… which is an extremely odd thing for the press to say, given that papers like WaPo have made comparisons between Trump and Hitler nearly every single day for the past year+
Basically, it forces them to de-value the same rhetorical weapons they’re constantly using against him.
Trump is using their playbook, instead of reacting like he is “supposed to” He apparently has no illusions who his political enemies are, and knows that being defensive is for losers. They make accusations so you make accusations. Put them on the back foot. And the odds are pretty good that he and/or his people were being wire tapped. Now all his enemies are gonna be on record that the wiretapping accusation is just absurd, crazy, “that never happened”. How soon before they have to admit, well yeah, we may have wiretapped you a little.
Its a terrible trend. When political leaders start dropping all the self-imposed limits on how they use govt powers against political opponents
Agreed. Other than the few examples the encyclopedia brains point out there, past presidents recognized it is best to go away. The fact most have had that self-imposed limit on themselves is kind of amazing.
I was just thinking that it is possible the biggest scandal of the Trump administration might be the Obama administration.
A+ for finding a picture of cross eyed beloved popular vote president.
+12 uhs.
I could hear beloved former President in my head.
It seemed spot on
This is the most rational and accurate take on this situation I’ve seen yet.
OT: I wonder about all these leftists *fighting Nazis* and all that.
Nazis killed Jews. But I bet most of them are anti-Israel and Pro-free Palestine.
Ironic to me.
That is the tip of the iceberg. They are indistinguishable in stance, rhetoric and behavior from the radical leftist agitators of the past. Fascist or commmie, take your pick; they are a weird mixture of both. The democrat party leadership is behind this and that party has been co-opted by radical leftists.
Nazis killed Jews. But I bet most of them are anti-Israel and Pro-free Palestine.
I doubt any of them put that much thought into things. They only care about achieving their goals.
what happened to secret nazi presidents tie in the last frame? It looks like it attempted to transform into the Rolling Stones ‘tongue’, then decided to quit halfway.
He’s so evil his tie is trying to escape.
Photoshop is a fickle beast.
This.
We need to get Clapper before congress. He’ll clear it all up.
*Groan* “Not to my knowledge.” I was kidding. It’s hard to even mock this stuff.
OK, this is getting silly. Time for a substantive news article:
Emma Watson ‘stunned’ by criticism that Vanity Fair cover is not feminist
The Beauty and the Beast actor said those who attack photo that shows parts of her breasts do not understand that ‘feminism is about giving women choice’
“Our bodies, our choices”, only as long as you make one particular choice.
They only have the breast of intentions.
Oh for God’s sake dont start that again.
You would prefer something more uplifting?
Cross my heart.
Will youtube wonders never cease?
Of if you want a different 40s/50s actress.
I guess someone has to be the worst over here. Sure. Go ahead bra’
Tits not a big deal. I didn’t take offense.
I’m trying to jog my mammary to think if there’s anyone with worse puns than Eddie.
OK. Y’all are all going to hell. Have pun with that.
Fine, for the entire lot of ye…
*narrows gaze*
Then why are you holding that stick?
FEMINISM CONTAINS MULTITUDES.
I smell meme.
The nose knows.
I was referring to her nose, BTW.
Thanks to everyone for the positive comments. As far as the errors go, I blew up the resolution so it would be easier to read, but that made some flaws a bit more apparent.
I saw no flaws. Some people are just haters and nitpickers. And I would like to say again……Becky?… would.
I couldn’t agree more. Would.
Oh, and yeah, good job BP
I also saw no flaws. I think its raw-ness is part of its charm
I enjoyed it. Commute time successfully occupied.
ZARDOZ SPEAKS TO YOU, HIS CHOSEN ONES.
THIS COMIC IS SUITABLY AMUSING FOR ALL BRUTALS. YOU WILL READ AND ENJOY.
It was much better than “CATS”.
See it again and again.
Somebody has a sense of humor.
LOL!
Heh.
1/2 star
See also his Twitter bio:
Eradicate fascist vermin. Careful when you fight monsters…
‘Intolerance will not be tolerated’
Back to square one.
“I love seeing the disparate messages because, I mean, all of our thoughts and feelings are kind of captured in these [materials],” Wright said. “They’re all so different, they’ve each got a valid point and that’s part of the problem we all face at this point … what issue are you going to fight against? All of them.”
If there’s one thing that’s obvious in today’s America, it’s that we want “radical social change”.
Your stomping ground, so I expect you to stomp it out.
Does scornful indifference count?
Sure. If you can pull that paradox off.
Meh.
“Careful when you fight monsters…” implies that they started out as normal and the demands of the battle turned them into little brownshirts. That is not the case.
“CHICAGO — When Mike Esposito transforms into the “Captain Chicago” character he trademarked, he’s on a simple mission.
“”My big thing is to install more pride in this city,” said Esposito, a major in the Army Reserves at Fort Sheridan. “I see this as a community service type of thing. Watching the news, the city’s been getting a bad rep.”…
“…Last week, he debuted a Captain Chicago song with lyrics that include “raise your shield, deep dish defender” and “for Chicago always be true.””
Does he have a bullet proof vest?
After further review, the Bears still suck.
True, but their ghosts of former glory are responsible for Chicago’s only worthy anthem.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uM44FRAcLTM
If Chicago becomes popular again, I hope they take some of NYC’s hipsters off our hands.
NO! We got enough in Wicker Park, Logan Square and the like, thanks.
People might mock Millenials now, but just you wait = The future-economy is going to be driven almost entirely by Ego-Stroking
Just watched Martha Raddatz ask a Trump surrogate why Trump would believe something carried by WaPo and The NYT. That is just so problematic and I’m having a hard time unpacking her statement.
Would believe, or wouldn’t believe?
I don’t know. My head is swimming.
Is that the same Martha Raddatz that was nearly in tears when Hillary lost? A paragon of journalistic integrity.
That’s hilarious.